After several days off with flu, Monica will be back in court today. She's finding it tough-going and she needs the support of each one of us who cares about individual liberty and limiting the power of the state. Here's what she had to say on Sunday night: https://youtu.be/co9oOngCeeU
You can show support by registering to watch the case and having it on in the background during your day. Win or lose, there will be huge learning and gains to be made from this case and we can't leave all the weight on the shoulders of this brave young woman! The information on how to register with the court is here https://www.monicasmit.com/watch-trial-live/
There are only about 30 spots in the courtroom – but maybe you will be lucky! If I lived or worked nearby I would give it a go.
What you can do is watch by zoom. It’s important to know, though, that there is a registering process and that takes time to do, so you need to take action now if you want to watch today.
The information on how to register with the court is here
Once you have registered you get your own individual link that works for the entire trial.
I believe every one of us must do what we can to battle the attacks on individual liberty going on throughout the Western world.
Small actions by many add up.
Having this court case on in the background today (like watching the cricket, the tennis or the Olympics (except we should boycott that after that opening ceremony!) ) is doing something.
Here are Monica's thoughts on day 1. She had about 60-70 people there. The trial goes on for 10 days. If you can attend on any of those days, please go! Each one of us can make a difference. https://youtu.be/8w-cSQ-bhVc
I appreciate you telling your Covid awakening story and the role that Monica played in it. I, too, was fooled by the PsyOp until 2021, as the lies from my "trusted national broadcaster" became blatantly obvious ("dangerous horse pill" and Norman's "get the jab" obsession). My first intro to Monica was in Battleground Melbourne - and for a Sydneysider who hadn't heard about what DantheDictator had done in Melbourne, I was shocked to discover how easily our "democracy" had flipped. Even the party I had supported for years had now become The Silent Greens. I certainly hope our justice system has not been as corrupted as the German one which CJ Hopkins now finds himself pursued by - he is another like Monica who is prepared to fight.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1000. This means that 993 people out of 1000 will not be infected whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR, and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. For the safety of ourselves and our families, we should at least take a little time to look at the clinical trial reports. Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
The MMR shot is catastrophic to the human microbiome. Love Midwesterns work and have utmost respect, but the evidence on MMR is false. You don't find what you don't look for, and the industry has been very specific, in NOT looking for harmful evidence on MMR.😐
Since he is a clinician and not a molecular biologist, he does not seem to be knowledgeable about various RNAs, non-code DNA, code DNA, epigenetics, etc. However, I think that there are few clinicians as kind as him who do not even know the difference between ARR and RRR.
Sorry I missed this but I have a suggestion for future peaceful protests. If everybody wears a blue “Press” vest then the police response may be different!
After several days off with flu, Monica will be back in court today. She's finding it tough-going and she needs the support of each one of us who cares about individual liberty and limiting the power of the state. Here's what she had to say on Sunday night: https://youtu.be/co9oOngCeeU
You can show support by registering to watch the case and having it on in the background during your day. Win or lose, there will be huge learning and gains to be made from this case and we can't leave all the weight on the shoulders of this brave young woman! The information on how to register with the court is here https://www.monicasmit.com/watch-trial-live/
All X users, please follow and share Monica's post to show your support.
Our aim is to end the political careers of those who use Police as their Fascist tools.
https://x.com/reignitedemaust/status/1815168506339717557
Please show support for Monica’s case today by watching the court proceedings.
She thinks something important is going to happen!
You have to admire this young woman’s courage and boldness. She thinks BIG. Listen to her foreshadow today’s events.
https://youtu.be/jm0C1czFPEQ
There are only about 30 spots in the courtroom – but maybe you will be lucky! If I lived or worked nearby I would give it a go.
What you can do is watch by zoom. It’s important to know, though, that there is a registering process and that takes time to do, so you need to take action now if you want to watch today.
The information on how to register with the court is here
https://www.monicasmit.com/watch-trial-live/
Once you have registered you get your own individual link that works for the entire trial.
I believe every one of us must do what we can to battle the attacks on individual liberty going on throughout the Western world.
Small actions by many add up.
Having this court case on in the background today (like watching the cricket, the tennis or the Olympics (except we should boycott that after that opening ceremony!) ) is doing something.
Here are Monica's thoughts on day 1. She had about 60-70 people there. The trial goes on for 10 days. If you can attend on any of those days, please go! Each one of us can make a difference. https://youtu.be/8w-cSQ-bhVc
I appreciate you telling your Covid awakening story and the role that Monica played in it. I, too, was fooled by the PsyOp until 2021, as the lies from my "trusted national broadcaster" became blatantly obvious ("dangerous horse pill" and Norman's "get the jab" obsession). My first intro to Monica was in Battleground Melbourne - and for a Sydneysider who hadn't heard about what DantheDictator had done in Melbourne, I was shocked to discover how easily our "democracy" had flipped. Even the party I had supported for years had now become The Silent Greens. I certainly hope our justice system has not been as corrupted as the German one which CJ Hopkins now finds himself pursued by - he is another like Monica who is prepared to fight.
Thanks for your comment Rosemary and I would love to hear your story one day. I am ashamed to say I knew nothing about CJ Hopkins. Thank you for alerting me to this https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/the-peoples-court-of-new-normal-germany
Layman can understand this with a little study.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1000. This means that 993 people out of 1000 will not be infected whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR, and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. For the safety of ourselves and our families, we should at least take a little time to look at the clinical trial reports. Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenza A, B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
Vaccination Girdasil while infected is highly carcinogenic, so regular testing and early surgery are best.
However, the authorities have not made this mandatory, and I feel that they are being malicious.
Recently, vaccines have been approved without actual clinical trials (RCTs) and based solely on increased antibody titers,
but as you all know, RNA viruses mutate one after another, so antibodies are not very effective against the actual mutated RNA viruses.
A midwestern doctor (who remains anonymous for safety) says that in his experience, the only effective vaccines are BCG and, in underdeveloped countries with poor sanitation, add MMR. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-each?publication_id=748806&post_id=146563874&isFreemail=true&r=1820ci&triedRedirect=true
Reading this doctor's other posts makes it clear how vaccines have honed their deceptive capabilities for the sake of pharmaceutical profits.
Thank you Masaki. Not really on topic but interesting.
The MMR shot is catastrophic to the human microbiome. Love Midwesterns work and have utmost respect, but the evidence on MMR is false. You don't find what you don't look for, and the industry has been very specific, in NOT looking for harmful evidence on MMR.😐
Since he is a clinician and not a molecular biologist, he does not seem to be knowledgeable about various RNAs, non-code DNA, code DNA, epigenetics, etc. However, I think that there are few clinicians as kind as him who do not even know the difference between ARR and RRR.
Good Luck tomorrow Monica!
We, in the UK, hope you find a judge and jury that is honest and not part of the WEF cabal!
Unjabbed Mick (UK) I'll live longer without mRNA poisons injected as a 'vaccine'.
Sorry I missed this but I have a suggestion for future peaceful protests. If everybody wears a blue “Press” vest then the police response may be different!
Good Plan! Tommy Robinson purports to be 'Press' but they still trump up any crap to silence him from telling the truth! Unjabbed Mick (UK)