Don't worry - the ABS is ready for a bird flu pandemic!
They initiated regular reporting of flu and RSV at the end of April
Photo by Todd Trapani: https://www.pexels.com/photo/selective-focus-photography-of-white-hen-1405930/
The Austalian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has a reporting system ready and waiting for an influenza pandemic and it is also primed to deal with an uptick in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
The most recent edition of the Provisional Mortality Statistics (31st May 2024) announced that these two respiratory infections were going to be monitored along with covid in a section entitled “Deaths due to Acute Respiratory Infections in Australia 2022 - March 2024”.
There are three things about the report that concern me:
1. WHO rules favour flu as an underlying cause of death
Unfortunately, just as for covid, according to World Health Organisation guidance, if influenza appears anywhere in the chain of causal events on a death certificate it is put as the underlying cause of death.
This means that a person with stage 4 cancer, or advanced heart failure who dies when they catch the influenza virus, will be reported as having an underlying cause of death of influenza.
Of course, the ABS is unlikely to go against WHO guidelines. It would be nice, though, to see debate and discussion among scientists, health professionals and the public about whether that is the best way to classify such deaths.
One thing is sure, this approach will increase the number of deaths reported from flu, just as it does for deaths from covid.
2. Deaths ‘with’ flu and ‘with’ RSV are being reported
I’m also concerned that deaths ‘with flu’ and deaths ‘with RSV’ are going to be reported. At least, though, the sum of deaths ‘with and from’ influenza is not being tabulated. This approach, were it to happen, could lead to talk about ‘influenza-associated deaths’ and that should be resolutely opposed from the outset, I believe. This is because the death could be perceived incorrectly as a death from influenza when in fact it is a death from a different underlying cause.
Furthermore including deaths ‘with’ a condition runs counter to WHO guidance that states that “the cause of death for primary tabulation should be designated the underlying cause of death”. In other words, the WHO says every death has a single underlying cause, and that’s what matters when counting and comparing deaths from different causes.
This practice - of including covid-associated deaths in government statistics (giving total deaths ‘with and from’ covid, or ‘deaths with reported covid’) - was common;ly used during the declared covid pandemic. This measure is still being used by the ABS in an influential graph in its official excess mortality reports.
3. No meaningful baseline comparator
When the ABS first started the Provisional Mortality Statistics in June 2020, it provided a useful comparator (the average of the preceding five years) so we could see whether deaths were higher than ‘normal’. Sadly, they no longer compare to a baseline average of several years in this way.
The only comparators in the new report are the numbers for flu and RSV in 2022 and 2023. Many of the numbers for flu in those years are so small (under five) that they have been deemed ‘not publishable (np)’ presumably because of privacy concerns.
Where is the monthly data on deaths from these two conditions for the years going back to 2015 so we can see the numbers in context?
Let’s hope, if there is a bird-flu-spreading-to-humans scare, that fear does not turn us into headless chickens (as happened to many of us - including me - during covid), and that we keep our heads firmly attached this time!
Thank you for reading Clarity on Health. All our posts are free. Please share them. If you feel moved to support our work, consider becoming a paid member. You can cancel a monthly subscription at any time. Joining for one month gives a $5 donation, but you do need to remember to cancel!
Unbelievable they are rebranding the flu again🤦♀️. These people need to be locked away🤯
The sky is falling, just in time for elections.
Will be interesting to see if THEY can leverage it to THEIR advantage this time.
You may be interested in my articles: I logically dismiss the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide in my article: We breathe air not oxygen.
This deception is a hold-over from the mechanistic view of mammals.
We are not MACHINE MEN fuelled by combustion and exhaust gases.
Hydration NOT oxygenation underpins our physiology.
Hydration equals salt plus water.
Air is measured by its moisture or humidity.
Oxygen is calibrated by its DRYNESS in parts per million. Oxygen is man-made by stripping air of moisture.
Oxygen is converted to nitrogen with the addition of carbon particles to make a non-combustible oxygen.
I link a video demonstrating this with a home oxygen concentrator.
Air contains no oxygen or nitrogen or the other 1% of gases as these are PRODUCTS of air NOT constitutes of air.
Pollution is removed from air when it rains, self cleaning.
The lungs require air reaching the alveoli to be at 100% humidity, that is dew point or drop point, or water.
Can you see the problem oxygen presents?
The mucosa conditions the air with moisture and salt. So the drops arriving at the alveoli are salty.
The red blood cells are rehydrated with salt water in the alveoli capillaries as they pass through. The IV saline drip also rehydrates the red blood cells when they pass through the fluid.
Oxygen toxicity is due to its power to dehydrate. When oxygen is released from a container it wants to revert back to air. It extracts moisture from its surroundings to do this. When released into the respiratory tract the mucosa and alveoli became dehydrated. The damage this does is labeled reactive oxygen species ROS. Any reference to oxidation is really describing dehydration.
I assert zero oxygen is required in mammalian physiology.
There is more to tell ...
Click on my blue icon to read my articles.